
一 | Pyongyang's assumptions with regard to Washington's potential role in the COVID-19 pandemic apparently stem from a bombshell report by professors Jeffrey D Sachs and Neil L Harrison, published in May 2022 by peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal, The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS).,"Prof Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University had spent two years as chairman of the Lancet Commission on COVID and recently published a major paper in the prestigious PNAS journal arguing that the virus was very likely artificial, also calling for an independent inquiry into its possible American origins, but virtually all western media outlets ignored his dramatic reversal," says Ron Unz, an American technology entrepreneur, political activist, writer and the publisher of the Unz Review.,On 27 May, Sachs and Harrison released an op-ed for Project Syndicate, arguing that US authorities suppressed inquiries into the role US scientific research institutions may have played in creating the conditions of the COVID pandemic. "Yet if the coronavirus did indeed come from a lab, US culpability is almost certain," the professors insisted, calling for independent probes "not only into the outbreak in Wuhan, China, but also into the relevant US scientific research, international outreach, and technology licensing in the lead-up to the pandemic.",According to Sachs and Harrison, "the full story of the outbreak could involve America’s role in researching coronaviruses and in sharing its biotechnology with others around the world." The professors pointed out that "US scientists who work with SARS-like coronaviruses regularly create and test dangerous novel variants" to develop drugs and vaccines against them. These experiments, also known as "gain-of-function" research, have been conducted for decades prompting concerns that one day they could lead to an accidental outbreak or end up in the wrong hands, the scholars highlighted.,"In June, [Sachs] went even further in his public statements at a Spanish think-tank, describing the COVID virus as probably having an American origin," notes Unz. "In my opinion, Prof Sachs is merely stating what many senior figures in the West quietly believe or suspect but have been unwilling to mention publicly.",Situation in UkraineUS Has Helped Support 46 Biological Labs in Ukraine Over Last Two Decades, Pentagon Says9 June, 17:19 GMT,An Accidental Leak or a Warfare Tool?,America's experiments with viruses and dangerous pathogens have triggered concerns in Russia and China over the past few years. On 13 May 2020, Russia's Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov drew attention to a "dense network" of US biolabs located "along the perimeter of the Russian Federation and near Chinese borders".,Earlier this year, Beijing urged Washington to disclose the information about the activities of at least 360 biolabs in the world, presumably run by the US.,Since 2001, Russia, China, and many other countries have advocated the creation of a verification mechanism within the framework of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction to ensure biosafety across the world. Nonetheless, the US was "about the only country" which has categorically opposed this proposal for roughly 20 years, Lavrov revealed in 2020.,"Over the past 70 years, America has invested an estimated $100Bln in developing the world's largest and longest-standing biowarfare program," says Unz.,Situation in UkraineWhat's Behind Washington's Denial of Biowarfare Weapons Programme in Ukraine?12 March, 15:50 GMT,The American publisher suggested that the US could be responsible for the COVID outbreak long before Sachs and Harrison did. Furthermore, Unz does not rule out that the pathogen was used as a deliberate biowarfare tool against China and, possibly, Iran by "elements of [the US] national security establishment, though without the direct knowledge or authorization of President Donald Trump.",There are a lot of unknowns about the mysterious pandemic which is believed to have come from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. For instance, neither a COVID-19 "patient zero" nor a "guilty bat" have been found, which means that SARS-CoV-2 may actually have been circulating among humans some time before the late 2019 Wuhan outbreak, according to CBS News.,In April 2020, ABC News broke the story that a special medical intelligence unit within the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in the second week of November 2019 produced a classified report warning about an "out-of-control disease epidemic" in the Wuhan area of China. It urged the US to protect its forces in Asia. Although a Pentagon spokesman officially denied the existence of that November report, Israel's broadcaster Channel 12 said the US had also shared the document in question with NATO and Israeli Defense Force (IDF).,It appears suspicious, according to Unz, that the DIA rushed to dub the mysterious disease an "epidemic" at a time when just a couple of dozen individuals were infected in Wuhan.,"It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself," Unz points out. "Furthermore, the New York Times and CNN have also promoted a major new research study just published in Science that found the first Wuhan infection probably occurred on 18 November 2019. This was after the secret DIA report had already been produced, but the American media has completely ignored the implications of this striking discrepancy.",Yet another strange coincidence was Donald Trump's appointment of Robert Kadlec as the top official for dealing with biological threats in 2017, the American writer says. Since the Nineties, Kadlec had been one of America’s leading biowarfare advocates.,"From January to August 2019, Kadlec’s department ran the 'Crimson Contagion' simulation exercise, involving the hypothetical outbreak of a dangerous respiratory viral disease in China, which eventually spreads to the United States, with the participants focusing on the necessary measures to control it in this country," Unz says, adding that before that China had suffered two inexplicable viral epidemics which hit its poultry and pork industry in 2018 and 2019, respectively.,Situation in UkraineUkraine Labs: Bioweapons Can be Used as Tool in US Low-Level War Against Russia, ex-DoD Analyst Says15 April, 12:51 GMT,History of Pentagon's Bio-warfare,Although the Pentagon's alleged responsibility for the COVID outbreak has yet to be examined and backed by solid evidence, one must admit that Washington is no novice where biological warfare is concerened.,The US was accused of using germ weapons against Korea during the Korean War (1950-1953) and China based on the testimony of at least 38 US military pilots.,In August 2021, Xinhua quoted witnesses and historians describing how the Pentagon used germ bombs in civilian areas in China and Korea to spread dozens of species of poisonous insects and germs.,And Havana leveled accusations against the Pentagon over the dengue epidemic in Cuba that contaminated 345,000 people in 1981 and an artificial outbreak of African swine fever (ASF) that led to the slaughter of 500,000 animals and inflicted considerable economic damage on the island nation in 1971. The US Department of Defense denied the allegations.,"Over the years highly regarded and fully mainstream American journalists and academics have published books and articles documenting America's extensive use of biowarfare during the Korean War and later as anti-food supply attacks against Cuba, East Germany, and other countries," notes Unz.,Recently, Russia's Ministry of Defense has revisited cases pertaining to the US history of biological warfare, while examining a trove of highly sensitive documents shedding light on the Pentagon's experiments with highly contagious pathogens in Ukraine. According to the MoD, the Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) division ran a network of biological labs in Ukraine with the aim of inflicting damage on Russia's people and economy.,"I'm certainly aware of the Russian Ministry of Defense public claims regarding the Pentagon's involvement in Ukrainian biolabs, and the preparation of possible biowarfare attacks against Russia," says Unz. "I don't have any special knowledge of this issue, but the apparent public admission by [Undersecretary of State] Victoria Nuland at a US Senate hearing convinced me that there was a high likelihood that these Russian accusations were correct.",Unz argues that "American military plans for biowarfare attacks against Russia dramatically increase the likelihood that similar measures had been prepared against China and Iran, and perhaps actually carried out by rogue elements of the Trump Administration." Although US secretive biological programs and the Pentagon's overseas biowarfare labs have been triggering further suspicions, the topic still remains largely neglected and suppressed by western mainstream media.。2017年10月,亚马逊创始人贝索斯取代了盖茨,成为拥有数千亿财富的世界首富。

二 | 他的妻子麦肯齐·贝索斯也成为了新世界最富有的女人。但她很快就会有一个新的头衔,世界上最富有的女人。贝佐斯,世界第四富有的人,今天在社交网站上宣布,他将与麦肯锡离婚,并计划结束他25年的婚姻。贝佐斯写道:“经过长时间的情感探索和试婚,我们决定离婚,继续做朋友……我们很幸运能找到彼此,即使我们知道25年后我们会分手,我们仍然会在一起…根据彭博富豪榜,贝佐斯最新的财富是1370亿美元,这意味着麦肯锡理论上可以得到685亿美元的一半。

三 | 她将超越沃尔玛创始人的女儿爱丽丝·沃尔顿,成为世界上最富有的新女性。离婚后,贝佐斯将退休,成为世界上第四富有的人,拥有900多亿美元的盖茨将再次成为世界上最富有的人。贝索斯离婚会影响亚马逊吗?没那么大。

四 | 即使贝佐斯只有一半(8%)的股份,他仍然是亚马逊最大的股东。如果麦肯锡不反对他(他们在声明中非常平静),这不会影响他对亚马逊的控制,因此不会转移股权和董事会动荡。

五 | 这就是为什么今天亚马逊的股价虽然在宣布离婚后略有下降,但仍然上涨,市值为8114亿美元,继续位居全球上市公司榜首。下面简单介绍一下全球三大富豪榜:盖茨的920亿美元,巴菲特的840亿美元,吕的法国老板伯纳德·阿尔纳特的720亿美元。其次是扎拉的老板Amancio Ortega,630亿美元,墨西哥电信大亨Carlos Slim,590亿美元,Facebook的扎克伯格(564亿美元)。

六 | 扎克伯格的财富在2018年下降了近200亿美元,因为Facebook的股票由于各种丑闻而大幅下跌。

七 | 虽然财富只是敌人层面上的一个数字,但超级富豪也需要面子。结婚后,她从无到有地创办了亚马逊。但麦肯锡不是那种只靠年轻的美貌才能攀上超级富豪行列的花瓶小姐。

八 | 她和贝索斯已经到了银婚的年龄,抚养了四个孩子,在相互支持下创造了商业传奇。他们的关系始于1992年,当时贝索斯比麦肯齐大6岁。贝佐斯仍在为华尔街对冲基金D.E.Shaw工作,而麦肯锡是他采访的候选人;麦肯锡成功进入之后,他们发现自己离彼此的办公室很近,而且还是普林斯顿的校友。来自新墨西哥的贝佐斯更像是在梦中嫁给一个贫穷的男孩,而不是来自旧金山的麦肯齐,他有一个很好的家庭。

九 | 他们三个月后订婚,一年后结婚。

十 | 1994年,在麦肯齐的鼓励下,贝佐斯从美国东海岸的纽约搬到西海岸的西雅图,在那里他建立了在线书店亚马逊。麦肯锡还积极参与了亚马逊早期的创业活动。在亚马逊最初的圣诞节订单激增期间,麦肯锡和普通员工一样,来到亚马逊简陋的办公室、地下室翻修过的仓库和门板,在会议室里制作桌子,以便于合作。就像马云的妻子张颖一样,随着亚马逊的业务逐渐步入正轨,麦肯锡逐渐淡出公司,开始了自己的业务。她不仅是四个孩子的母亲,还有更多的家庭责任;她还是一位慈善家,成立了反欺凌组织旁观者革命,捐出20亿美元帮助美国无家可归者和学前教育。她也是一位著名的小说家,曾写过两部评价很高的小说,分别于2005年和2013年出版。和其他超级富有的妻子一样,麦肯锡除了在一些公共场合陪伴丈夫之外,仍然低调而秘密。贝佐斯最大的财富是他在亚马逊16%的股份,亚马逊目前的市值超过8100亿美元,是世界上最大的上市公司。当他们结婚时,他们仍然是普通的白领,签署婚前协议的可能性很小。

十一 | 亚马逊成立于1994年,那是贝佐斯和麦肯锡结婚后的第二年。

十二 | 1000亿美元的股份属于这对夫妇的共同财产。尽管华盛顿州法律也规定,夫妇可以在申请离婚后三个月的平静期内撤回离婚申请。但考虑到贝佐斯和麦肯齐已经选择公开宣布离婚,他们的婚姻似乎已经结束,他们只是选择友好地分手。

十三 | 以平静的语气,也许他们已经就财产分割达成了协议。

十四 | 根据亚马逊总部所在地华盛顿州的法律,如果双方未能达成协议,双方将平等分享共同财产。这意味着如果麦肯锡将亚马逊的一半股份交给贝索斯,他将成为世界上最富有的新女性。值得一提的是,盖茨夫妇于1994年结婚,那时微软已经上市多年,盖茨在那一年成为美国最富有的人。他们一直保持着爱的形象,积极投身于慈善事业。然而,即使在未来,盖茨也不需要分割一半的家庭财产。婚前协议真的很重要。虽然超级富豪离婚案件比比皆是,但从未有过如此大规模的财产分割案件。甲骨文的创始人爱立信有一个500多亿美元的家庭,已经离婚四次,但他的家庭地位并没有受到任何影响。在甲骨文成立之前,他与第一任妻子离婚,甲骨文刚刚开始第二次离婚;虽然埃里森在与第三和第四任妻子结婚时已成为一名超级富豪,但专业律师团队提供了一份合理的婚前协议,以确保他的离婚只是一笔毛毛细雨般的赡养费。他从不缺各种漂亮的女人。当谷歌联合创始人布林于2015年离婚时,他身价超过300亿美元。

十五 | 但谷歌成立于1998年,他的前妻安妮·沃奇奇(YouTube首席执行官的妹妹)直到2007年才正式结婚,并签署了婚前协议。这对夫妇有一个儿子和一个女儿,但他们在2013年分居,因为布林爱上了谷歌的一名女员工,两年后他们正式离婚。

十六 | 据美国媒体估计,尽管这两名男子没有透露房地产部门的细节,布林还是为此付出了10亿美元。这对他来说是最好的结果。此外,安妮·沃特斯基本人也是一位成功的企业家。她出生于一个学术家庭,是基因检测公司23 andme的创始人和首席执行官。回顾过去最昂贵的离婚案件,离婚费高达数十亿美元,其中大多数人都渴望离婚与新人结婚。一级方程式赛车老板伯尼·埃克莱斯顿(BernieEcclestone)为2008年的离婚支付了12亿美元。

十七 | 赌博大亨史蒂夫·韦恩和他的前妻伊莲·韦恩离婚两次,离婚金额超过10亿美元。美国石油和天然气大亨哈罗德•哈姆(HaroldHamm)于2015年支付9.75亿美元离婚费后,提起了一项为期两年的诉讼。

十八 | 美国亿万富翁威尔登斯坦1999年离婚后,花了2.5亿美元与前妻分居。他的前妻乔斯林·威尔登斯坦为了保住丈夫而疯狂地做整容手术,但一次又一次的手术彻底改变了她的面貌,这直接导致了威尔登决定离婚。1999年,68岁的默多克爱上了31岁的邓文迪,并渴望与31岁的前妻安娜·曼离婚。他最终花了17亿美元分手。

十九 | 离婚17天后,默多克匆忙与邓文迪结婚。这段婚姻于2013年结束,当时邓文迪只在纽约和北京购置了一处房产,而默多克的房产不足百分之一。三年后,85岁的默多克迎来了他的第四任妻子,前模特杰瑞·霍尔。在被围困的堡垒里,据说老年人相爱就像着火的旧房子,这是无望的。

| 这是一句名言。俄罗斯矿业寡头弗拉基米尔·波塔宁(VladimirPotanin)是“最昂贵的离婚”超级富豪,他们被均分。2014年,他与31岁的丈夫和妻子娜塔莉·波塔宁(Natalie Potanin)离婚时,他在20世纪90年代建立的采矿帝国价值140亿美元的财产完全一分为二。

| 他很快在同一年娶了第二任妻子。

| 如果你想放弃,你会得到一半的家庭财产。
Current article:http://syn.minpinpengcemiuanjiuxuan.pics/list_ujcc5s/191.html
Published on:00:01:29
上一篇:晶丰明源:上半年净利润8654.71万元,同比增长449.09%
下一篇:期待更多“国民餐饮顶流” 《扩大消费“十五五”规划》鼓励地方打造美食集聚区和特色小吃产业集群,期待更多“国民餐饮顶流” 《扩大消费“十五五”规划》鼓励地方打造美食集聚区和特色小吃产业集群